Articles delegate-en/5010-5020 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 5010 - 5020   digest:
Question about SOCKS-Proxy
  01/31-23:12 . 5010  psijqbdyi-hugik5wr4jxr.ml@ml.delegate.org [136]
___ Hi, Yutaka, indeed this works! :-) Delegate is a great work! Thank you! Again greetings from Germany, Patrick Am schrieb Yutaka Sato <feedback@delegate.org>:
delegate: socksmux doesn't work when running in background
  02/02-11:46 . 5011  Renaud Bompuis <psmjqbdyi-hugik5wr4jxr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [114]
___ Hi, I am trying to make delegate work as a multiplexed SOCKS tunnel, as described here: http://www.delegate.org/delegate/SOCKS/sockmux/ Basically, I want to use 2 servers to relay proxy data efficie
  02/02-22:04 . 5012  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [40]
___ Hi, I could reproduce the problem which seems a bug that have been introduced in 9.9.0-pre2. Unfortunately there seems no workaround by command options to escape the problem. A possible way to solve
  02/03-11:53 . 5013  Renaud Bompuis <psmjqbdyi-hugik5wr4jxr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [68]
___ Hi Yutaka, thanks for the reply. I compiled delegate 9.9.8-pre20 but it doen's work in sockmux mode, I get this error message: (UNIX) 10:44:57.405 [11696] ## sox_connects: Not Available in the Sourc
  02/03-17:42 . 5014  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [101]
___ Hi, Sorry, I'm reminded that SockMux is restricted in source code distributions after the DeleGate/9.8.6. You can use "-f" instead of "-v" to redirect the logging output to the logfile. The max. par
Fwd: LDAP proxy with search filter
  02/06-15:40 . 5015  "Sunil S" <pv4iabdyi-hugik5wr4jxr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [137]
___ Dear Yutaka, Request your attention to my earlier mail (below). Could you tell me if it is possible to apply filters in a proxy ldap situation? Regards Sunil Dear Yutaka, Greetings! When I try to us
  02/06-17:16 . 5016  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [20]
___ Hi, Mabe the answer is NO. As long as I remember, the implementation of LDAP in DeleGate is very simple one just to do proxying by switching a target LDAP server (with MOUNT parameters) for a baseOb
  02/06-17:44 . 5017  "Sunil S" <pv4iabdyi-hugik5wr4jxr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [124]
___ Thanks, Yutaka! While the preferred tool is the Swiss Army Knife (delegate), we are currently working around the problem with OpenLDAP META back-end. Regards -- Sunil Hi, Mabe the answer is NO. As l
doepsv:sv
  03/01-03:24 . 5019  Marvin Tapessur <pn4iqbdyi-hugik5wr4jxr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [38]
___ Hi Yutaka, Quick question; if I configure "doepsv:sv" and EPSV is not supported on the connecting FTP server will it fall back to PASV? Hope to hear from you soon. Rgds, Marvin
  03/01-12:56 . 5020  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [18]
___ Hi, No. I checked the implementation. It is manipulated in src/ftp.c:connectPASV() and but the fallback from EPSV to PASV is not cared. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato (CSDP,ITIL-F,OCUP-A,Security+,I
Empty-Articles = [5018]
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:04/02 08:02:03 (0 sec) Expires:04/02 14:02:03 @_@V