Article delegate-en/4667 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
[Reference:<_A4664@delegate-en.ML_>]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: FTP Delegate
20 Nov 2009 17:24:11 GMT frederic montiton <pbijabdyi-yavwm6yvfvxr.ml@ml.delegate.org>



Ignore my previous comment about FREAD function, no links with my problem..

Strange behaviour .. I've try a compilation : make CFLAGS="-O2 -m64" and it avoids the DNONC99 issue.
compiles, but, I can't run it without the RESOLV="" flags.

I'll try again next monday, and give you more details.

Cheers

> To: feedback@delegate.org
> CC: pbijabdyi-yavwm6yvfvxr.ml@ml.delegate.org
> Subject: Re: [DeleGate-En] FTP Delegate
> From: feedback@delegate.org
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:35:33 +0900
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In message <_A4662@delegate-en.ML_> on 11/19/09(19:42:44)
> you frederic montiton <pbijabdyi-yavwm6yvfvxr.ml@ml.delegate.org> wrote:
>  |I've seen and correct it :)
> 
> Can I see whether or not you got the 64bits binary for Solaris10/SPARC
> which works for data larger than 4GB ?
> Is DeleGate/9.9.6-pre4 able to be made without modification?
> 
>  |Also found why -DNONC99 flags is set :
>  |
>  |#make 
>  |....
>  |ld: fatal: file /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.4.6/../../../libstdc++.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
>  |ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to a.out
>  |collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>  |        [gcc -c -O2 -x c++ -DQS] NONC99 = 3
>  |...
>  |
>  |strange because:
>  |
>  |#ldd /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.4.6/../../../libstdc++.so
>  |
>  |        libm.so.2 =>     /lib/64/libm.so.2
>  |        libgcc_s.so.1 =>         /usr/local/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1
>  |        libc.so.1 =>     /lib/64/libc.so.1
>  |        /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V245/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
>  |
>  |References are only to sparcv9 libraries..
>  |
>  |Any clue?
> 
> It is strange that gcc fails in its "ld" phase even though it is
> invoked with the "-c" option (expected to be without ld phase)
> Can I see the result of "make CC=g++" ?
> 
> Cheers,
> Yutaka
> --
>   9 9   Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/
>  ( ~ )  National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
> _<   >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
> Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/00000000X/direct/01/

  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
@_@V