Articles delegate-en/4590-4620 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4590 - 4620   digest:
FTP extended passive mode issues
  09/26-15:30 . 4590 (Yutaka Sato) [17]
___ Hi, A confirmation is valuable information for me and will be helpful for readers of a thread of messages in the archive in future. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> http://delega
Fwd: [DeleGate-En] how to implement SNI on https? detailed instruction please.
  09/29-10:30 . 4591  David Wang <> [86]
___ Sorry I ran that with port 999 by mistake, rather than 9999. But when I did the step 2, the delegate cli as client is still not working: /var/spool/delegate-nobody/bin/delegated FSV=sslway https://l
how to implement SNI on https? detailed instruction please.
  09/29-13:10 . 4592  David Wang <> [151]
___ Hi Yutaka, Since the limited browsers support SNI, can I ask your another question? If we'd still like to achieve the same scenario without using SNI: most customers still https access the portal vi
Fwd: [DeleGate-En] how to implement SNI on https? detailed instruction please.
  09/29-14:55 . 4593 (Yutaka Sato) [21]
___ Sorry, you need to specify "-Fdget" to use DeleGate as a HTTP client as: delegated -Fdget FSV=... Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Inst
  09/29-16:28 . 4594  David Wang <> [78]
___ thanks a lot for your information. how about my another question of today? Regards David
DeleGate/9.9.5 (STABLE) -- more stable and portable
  09/30-11:02 . 4595 (Yutaka Sato) [79]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.9.5 (STABLE) -- more stable and portable This release includes many fixes to make DeleGate version 9
multiple SSL certificates on the same delegate host without using SNI.
  09/30-14:10 . 4596  David Wang <> [67]
___ Hi Yutaka, I think its better for this question to be another topic though itís related with my last question (how to implement SNI on https) which has been answered already, thanks again here. Sinc
udp associate upstreaming
  09/30-17:51 . 4597  <> [69]
___ Hi Yutaka! So I tried the new options for Socks5 interface binding and the source addresses for "socks-udp-tosv" are used indeed. But still, there seems to be a problem. After successful udp associa
Forbidden page
  10/01-03:38 . 4598  D R <> [15]
___ Hi, I'm new to Delegate. Is there a way to edit the Forbidden page? Thanks, Dave
udp associate upstreaming
  10/01-05:41 . 4599 (Yutaka Sato) [95]
___ Hi, Since I don't have a SOCKS client/server implementation other than DeleGate, a test what I could do was just chaining DeleGate for DNS over UDP as follows: Sv% delegated -fv -vd -P1080 SERVER=so
Forbidden page
  10/01-05:48 . 4600 (Yutaka Sato) [17]
___ You can do it as: MOUNT="/-/builtin/mssgs/403-forbidden.dhtml /tmp/forbidden.dhtml" See <URL:> Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.or
  10/01-21:43 . 4601  D R <> [71]
___ Hi Yataka, Thank you for the fast reply. However, I cannot find the paths described in the link. I'm using the windows build. Does that change the location of the customizable files? Thanks, Dave
  10/02-07:49 . 4602 (Yutaka Sato) [38]
___ Hi, The right hand value of the MOUNT parameter can be any URL which indicates the location of the data to be used. For example, you can put it on your local disk as follows: echo "Forbidden" > c:\t
Fwd: multiple SSL certificates on the same delegate host without using SNI.
  10/02-10:23 . 4603  David Wang <> [95]
___ Hi Yutaka, Any response is much appreciated. Regards David --- Forwarded message --- From: David Wang <> Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:08 PM Subject: multiple
Forbidden page
  10/06-00:25 . 4604  D R <> [121]
___ Hi Yutaka, Thank you for your help. Is there a way to remove the V link at the bottom of the customized page? Thanks, Dave
  10/06-10:18 . 4605 (Yutaka Sato) [15]
___ Hi, There is not a way to do so in the non-commercial version. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Scienc
Fwd: multiple SSL certificates on the same delegate host without using SNI.
  10/06-10:53 . 4606  David Wang <> [98]
___ Hi Yutaka, Can I know why no any response on this question? Is that any wrong with what I did? Kind regards, David --- Forwarded message --- From: David Wang <
PERMIT Permission bug?
  10/09-21:33 . 4607  NoSFeRaTU <> [57]
___ 10/09 16:12:41.30 [14021] 0+0: ext[0] SERVER=https 10/09 16:12:41.30 [14021] 0+0: ext[1] HOSTLIST= 10/09 16:12:41.30 [14021] 0+0: ext[2] PERMIT=*:*: 10/09 16:12:41.30 [14021] 0
  10/10-17:11 . 4608 (Yutaka Sato) [19]
___ Re: [DeleGate-En] PERMIT Permission bug? I'm not sure but it might be a side effect of your configuration which is not shown in the log. By the way, what does this HOSTLIST mean? Cheers, Yutaka 9 9
  10/10-18:47 . 4609  NoSFeRaTU <> [27]
___ It means nothing, just a result of experiments with parameters :-) Problem appears with this simple config: -P5555 SERVER=http PERMIT="*:*:" I found out why it happens. It is because 10.1
  10/11-17:50 . 4610 (Yutaka Sato) [134]
___ Hi, I see. I found the problem can be reproduced with "SAC=x.x.x.x" option to simulate an access control for access from a client "x.x.x.x" as follows. This test does not need any change of configur
  10/12-00:35 . 4611  NoSFeRaTU <> [174]
___ <-- CUT --> I applied enclosed patch across 9.9.5, under simulation with SAC="" seems works with: delegated SERVER=http HOSTS="nosferatu.gnet/{,}" SAC="" -dh PERMI
  10/15-06:50 . 4612 (Yutaka Sato) [30]
___ Hi, It must not work becase the hostname is resolved to which does not match with Defining HOSTS that includes real name or address will suppress the real resolution and can c
  10/16-07:50 . 4613  NoSFeRaTU <> [55]
___ SAC="nosferatu.gnet" YS> |-dh PERMIT="*:*:" After some investigation I found in /etc/hosts that string: nosferatu.gnet nosferatu which seems come with OS installation. I have ch
Delegate - AIX 6.1 Compilation Errors
  10/24-17:48 . 4614  Antonio Hernandez Jr <> [74]
___ Hello, We like to install the latest Delegate on our new AIX servers 6.1(oslevel 6100-00-00-000X), 64bit Hardware and Kernel having both C compilers XL C/C++ 10.1.04 and GNU gcc-4.2.4-1. We followed
  10/26-18:02 . 4615 (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, These errors occurs by lacking of some symbols in object files under maker/ as bzero.o and socklen_*.o which must be included into lib/libsubst.a. You will be able to see the reason of the compi
Delegate 9.9.5: how to disable "CD //"?
  10/27-00:20 . 4616  HD Sorgenia | Andrea `Zuse' Balestrero <> [24]
___ I'm configuring delegate v9.9.5 as reverse proxy for FTP / FTPS. There is a feature, enabled by default, that I don't like: external user seems to be allowed to access delegate with anonymous accoun
  10/27-00:49 . 4617 (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ Hi, The option RELAY=no will disable relaying to servers other than MOUNTed ones. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Institute of Advance
FTP Delegate
  11/04-01:22 . 4618  frederic montiton <> [59]
___ Hi, I'm currently my hair with a maybe impossible configuration Client ===> DeleGate-FTP:2121 ===> DeleGate-FTP:21 ===> Any FTP server:21 Basically I want to have an authentication on the first Dele
  11/04-11:13 . 4619 (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ Hi, There can be several possible ways to chain FTP DeleGates, or relaying a FTP DeleGate to servers via another application level proxy as SOCKS, or relaying FTP clients transparenly via ipfw/iptab
odst.- & proxy issue
  11/05-20:18 . 4620  NoSFeRaTU <> [39]
___ When using SERVER="http://odst.-:-/" and PROXY="x.x.x.x:3128" together request going with ip address, not a domain name. This cause troubles on virtual hosting servers. For example for http://delega
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:06/26 17:50:11 (1 sec) Expires:06/26 23:50:10 @_@V