Article delegate-en/4151 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: SESSION Control Protocol (SCP)
25 Sep 2008 12:11:20 GMT (Yutaka Sato)
The DeleGate Project

In message <_A4148@delegate-en.ML_> on 09/23/08(20:59:55)
you "Andre E." <> wrote:
 |Hi again...I'm sorry, it's Session Control Protocol, not Stream Control Protocol.
 |Will future versions of delegate by any chance contain an implementation
 |of the SESSION Control Protocol?
 |    *
 |    *

Why you need it?
I thought a common session control layer as in the OSI reference model
should have been introduced when HTTP upgraded from 1.0 to 1.1 in which
"Keep-Alive" became the default.  If introduced, I think it might have
made things simple and clear including parallel and/or pipelined sessions
on a single TCP connection, not only for HTTP but for arbitrary protocols,
reducing the latency between peers with long RTT.
I remember that someone suggested such a simple and generic session control
for HTTP/1.1 but it is not supported, but "chunked" and "content-length"
based message delimiter just for a single session is adopted.
But anyway I needed some kind of multiplexing on a TCP connection,
I made several experimental protocols including Teleport/Vehicle, ThruWay,
and SockMux.  I'm using the last one yet to connect between DeleGates as

  9 9   Yutaka Sato <>
 ( ~ )  National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
_<   >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller

  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]