Articles delegate-en/4130-4140 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4130 - 4140   digest:
Allowing tcprelay during a time window
  09/12-02:28 . 4130  Sunil S <peiiabdyi-bfsye3y4i25r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [28]
___ Hi, Yutaka, I tried to use : delegated -v -f -P$ListenPort ADMIN=nobody@nowhere.. MAXIMA=conpch:1 RELIABLE=$ReliableIP PERMIT=*:-T.$StartTime-$EndTime:* RES_WAIT=0 TIMEOUT=silence:5m SERVER=tcprelay
performance measurements and socks question
  09/13-18:43 . 4131  "Andre E." <pzyhqbdyi-bfsye3y4i25r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [86]
___ Hi. I played around with the VSAP protocol as well as with the HTTP ACCEPT method and it works a long as I'm only dealing with one client. This is probably due to the fact that once a client connect
Allowing tcprelay during a time window
  09/14-21:09 . 4132  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [72]
___ Hi, Your guess on the behavior of DeleGate is very reasonable but it is not so yet. I think it should be implemented in future maybe in DeleGate/10.X. As a workaround for the time being, I made a ge
performance measurements and socks question
  09/14-21:36 . 4133  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [31]
___ Hi, To enable multiple-parallel clients to do bind on the same port, you need to do either A) reserving the port with the PORT parameter to be shared in child DeleGate processes, or B) running DeleG
  09/14-23:17 . 4134  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [81]
___ Hi, Sorry, I noticed B) is not true in the exsisting implementation. It can be enabled with the enclosed patch. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ )
DeleGate/9.8.5 (BETA) -- fixes for Windows
  09/16-02:37 . 4135  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.8.5 (BETA) -- fixes for Windows This release includes fixes mainly for Windows. FIX don't remove Con
performance measurements and socks question
  09/16-20:12 . 4136  "Andre E." <pzyhqbdyi-bfsye3y4i25r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [45]
___ Hi Yutaka. Thanks again for all the effort. Your patch works and your explanation actually helped a lot. In another message from you, you said the die VSAP protocol could wrap SOCKS if necessary. Do
Allowing tcprelay during a time window
  09/17-16:54 . 4138  Sunil S <peiiabdyi-bfsye3y4i25r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [150]
___ Dear Yutaka, Thank you very much for the prompt response. With the patch, it is now terminating the connection at the end of PERMIT period as required! Thanks. Just a side note - the patch applying
  09/17-17:34 . 4139  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [19]
___ Hi, To which version did you applied it? The latest version (9.8.5) was released including the extension thus the patch is not necessary (and is not applicable). Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sa
performance measurements and socks question
  09/17-20:07 . 4140  "Andre E." <pzyhqbdyi-bfsye3y4i25r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [31]
___ Hi. I've talked with my colleagues and we discussed various possibilities, but we did not come up with a solution yet. So here is a more detailed explanation about what we would like to achieve. We
Empty-Articles = [4137]
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:09/16 02:23:45 (1 sec) Expires:09/16 08:23:44 @_@V