Article delegate-en/4123 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
[Reference:<_A4121@delegate-en.ML_>]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: performance measurements and socks question
11 Sep 2008 04:06:11 GMT feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato)
The DeleGate Project


Hi,

In message <_A4121@delegate-en.ML_> on 09/11/08(11:51:18) I wrote:
 | |We would also like to know whether it is possible to use the BIND
 | command to open a specific port on the SOCKS server
 | |not just for one client connection, but for multiple client connections.
 |
 |Is it possible with other implementations of a SOCKS server?
 |Since the tcp connection established by the BIND command on the SOCKS
 |protocol becomes a transparent connection with the remote peer after
 |the ACCEPT command, there is no chance to reuse it for another ACCEPT.

If your intension is just to use a persistent port (as 80/HTTP)
to accept client's connection via the SOCKS server, (not to repeat
ACCEPT on the same SOCKS connection), you can use SRCIF with PORTS as this:

  PORTS="xx.xx.xx.xx:80"
  SRCIF="xx.xx.xx.xx:80:tcpbind"

If necessary, you can restrict this mapping of reserved port-number based
on the destination host (to be indicated by the SOCKS client) and the
IP-address of the SOCKS client's host, or by user name with AUTHORIZER.

Cheers,
Yutaka
--
  9 9   Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/
 ( ~ )  National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
_<   >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller

  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
@_@V