Articles delegate-en/4120-4130 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4120 - 4130   digest:
Socks bind timeout
  09/11-10:51 . 4120  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [28]
___ Hi, You can change the timeout of accept on a socket with a parameter as TIMEOUT=acc:180 of which default is TIMEOUT=acc:10. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/
performance measurements and socks question
  09/11-11:51 . 4121  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ Hi, Note that disabling the SSL cache with "TLSCONF=cache:no" will reduce the performance, possibly significantly. Also conditional SSL with "STLS=-fcl" (not with "STLS=fcl") might reduce the perfor
  09/11-12:06 . 4122  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [20]
___ Hi, Also the default behavior of DeleGate for on-demand dynamic process generation will reduce the performance due to the cost for fork/spawn processes. It could be faster with a fixed number of pro
  09/11-13:06 . 4123  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [30]
___ Hi, If your intension is just to use a persistent port (as 80/HTTP) to accept client's connection via the SOCKS server, (not to repeat ACCEPT on the same SOCKS connection), you can use SRCIF with PO
  09/11-20:16 . 4124  Andre <pzyhqbdyi-h5qfbm3ouj3r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [61]
___ Hi. The functionality you implemented in the VSAP protocol is actually not possible with other SOCKS implementations and I also suspected this to be an extension of the socks protocol. But the possi
  09/11-21:10 . 4125  Andre <pzyhqbdyi-h5qfbm3ouj3r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [32]
___ Yutaka Sato schrieb: This is my intention, but I would like to be able to do this at runtime, so that I send a command to the server server that there is a service X which wants to accept connection
DeleGate as FTP Authentication Proxy
  09/11-22:55 . 4126  "Gusti Benawi" <prqhabdyi-h5qfbm3ouj3r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [51]
___ Hello, I am trying to use TLS connection with the client and TCP with the server in connection with AUTHORIZER. Using following configuration: delegated -v -P2121 SERVER=ftp AUTHORIZER=serverhost MO
  09/11-23:34 . 4127  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [47]
___ Hi, You are right. It'll be fixed as the enclosed patch in the next release. Thank you. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of A
performance measurements and socks question
  09/11-23:46 . 4128  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [52]
___ Sorry, it is not "PORTS" but "PORT" as the reference manual says :p I don't see the insufficiency by PORT and SRCIF for your requirement. If necessary, you can select a port to be bound dynamically
VSAP and HTTP/ACCEPT (Re: performance measurements and socks question)
  09/12-00:23 . 4129  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [69]
___ Hi, The only documentation of VSAP is in its source file "src/vsap.c" VSAP was designed to replace the SOCKS protocol (but not :p) It is totally different from SOCKS protocol (but can wrap it if nec
Allowing tcprelay during a time window
  09/12-02:28 . 4130  Sunil S <peiiabdyi-h5qfbm3ouj3r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [28]
___ Hi, Yutaka, I tried to use : delegated -v -f -P$ListenPort ADMIN=nobody@nowhere.. MAXIMA=conpch:1 RELIABLE=$ReliableIP PERMIT=*:-T.$StartTime-$EndTime:* RES_WAIT=0 TIMEOUT=silence:5m SERVER=tcprelay
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:01/29 05:49:59 (0 sec) Expires:01/29 11:49:59 @_@V