Articles delegate-en/4000-4100 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4000 - 4100   digest:
ftp/tls +PASV +NAT
  06/12-04:56 . 4000  Darin Perusich <> [34]
___ Hello, I've read a few post on the mail-list about ftp/ssl connection timeouts when trying to establish passive connections to an ftp/tls server behind a firewall, though I don't believe these addre
  06/15-18:14 . 4001 (Yutaka Sato) [45]
___ First, if possible, you shoud setup your client to use EPSV instread of PASV. Unlike PASV, the EPSV response does not include the address of the FTP server but only shows the port number, like "229
  06/17-05:14 . 4003  Darin Perusich <> [28]
___ The server I'm connecting to doesn't support EPSV mode so this won't work. They are running a rather old version of WS_FTP. I tried setting this but it didn't make any difference, the connection sti
  06/17-10:06 . 4004 (Yutaka Sato) [63]
___ The command for data-connection establishment is hop-by-hop thus the command with the server is independent from the one with the client. For example, it can be EPSV with client and PASV with the se
delegate 9.7.7 and io timeout
  07/03-10:48 . 4005 [37]
___ Hello, At first, Many thanks for your great product! Few days ago, I updated delegate from 8.5.9 to 9.7.7. Then I found that ftp timeout (TIMEOUT=io:0) seems not working correctly. In delegate log ,
  07/03-15:41 . 4006 (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ Hi, I confirmed FTP-DeleGate acts like you described since 9.2.2-pre1 in which I supported the abortion of the data transfer on FTP (ABOR command). It must be called a bug and will be fixed as the e
pop / imap mounting problems
  07/14-21:07 . 4007  "Soenke J. Peters" <> [32]
___ Hi, I tried your delegate proxy as a protocol translator between pop3/imap4 and http. When using delegated -v -P8080 SERVER=http MOUNT="/mail/* imap://*" and trying to access http:/
Proxying sftp client to ftp sever (SERVER=sftp)
  07/14-23:12 . 4008  "Jean Aumont" <> [185]
___ Hi, I am currently looking to proxy an sftp client to an ftp server. From my research on the "Delegate" mailing list, article: it seem that this
pop / imap mounting problems
  07/15-13:23 . 4009 (Yutaka Sato) [34]
___ Hi, IMAP over HTTP is not supported. You can suppress the intepretation of "@" in username or password in the Basic authentication by escaping it to "%40" with the following option. HTTPCONF=passesc
Proxying sftp client to ftp sever (SERVER=sftp)
  07/15-15:07 . 4010 (Yutaka Sato) [29]
___ Hi, Unfortunately, DeleGate does not support it. I don't know what is better in sftp than ftp... If you need encryption or verification of data transfer over FTP, you can wrap FTP with SSL (using De
delegate code modification question
  07/17-20:50 . 4011  "Jeff Hinds (JAS)" <> [199]
___ Good day, I am trying to make a small change to your code to serve a certain purpose on our use of delegate. Basically, I want it to append a short string to the username during NNTP authentication
DeleGate/9.8.2 (BETA) -- porting to Windwos CE, name based reverse proxy
  07/18-21:31 . 4012 (Yutaka Sato) [82]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.8.2 (BETA) -- porting to Windwos CE, name based reverse proxy In this release, DeleGate has been por
DeleGate/9.8.3 (BETA) -- fixes for name-based MOUNT and dial-up for DNS
  07/22-07:50 . 4013 (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.8.3 (BETA) -- fixes for name-based MOUNT and dial-up for DNS This release fixes name-based reverse p
customization builtin messages and icons.
  07/23-12:35 . 4014  "David Wang" <> [149]
___ Hi Yutaka, According to the manual about customization from website, we are trying to customize those builtin messages without recompiling DeleGate by defining: MOUNT="/-/builtin/*
Testing the HTTP/HTTPS and FTP Delegate proxy
  07/26-03:04 . 4015  "Jean Aumont" <> [86]
___ Hi Yutaka, I am currently doing some tests on proxy software and I am trying to set-up 2 proxies, one that support Http/Https and the other that support FTP. I have decided to test the "Delegate" pr
  07/26-05:00 . 4016 (Yutaka Sato) [69]
___ Hi, Firstly, DeleGate selects one AUTHORIZER based on the set of destination protocol, the destination server and the client of the current session. Then the AUTHORIZER is applied to authenticate (a
customization builtin messages and icons.
  07/28-17:16 . 4017 (Yutaka Sato) [74]
___ Hi, You are recommended to test it with a simple configuration as this: [the content of http://localhost:8080/builtin/mssgs/404-notfound.dhtml] XXXX not-found XXXX ... cutomized not-found message [D
Testing the HTTP/HTTPS and FTP Delegate proxy
  07/28-21:56 . 4018  "Jean Aumont" <> [126]
___ Hi Yutaka, Thanks for your prompt response on Question 1. It is exactly what I was looking for. I wish you would had answer the second Question also. You probably just missed it since my email was s
customization builtin messages and icons.
  07/29-10:24 . 4019  "David Wang" <> [256]
___ Hi Yutaka, I did a test as you suggested, it seems working fine, and the log is as below: 07/29 10:21:07.51 [29415] 0+0: arg[4] MOUNT=/-/builtin/* http://localhost:8080/delegate/builtin/* 07/29 10:2
Testing the HTTP/HTTPS and FTP Delegate proxy
  07/29-16:31 . 4020 (Yutaka Sato) [70]
___ Hi, You are asking somewhat unsupported or unspecified feature rathar than a bug. The AUTHORIZER parameter, if not used as a MOUNT option, is for a DeleGate as an origin FTP server not as a FTP prox
customization builtin messages and icons.
  07/29-19:51 . 4021 (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ Hi, You seem using old version of DeleGate as HTTPS server which could be heavy and slow in HTTPS/SSL gateway. Anyway it seem that MOUNT for /-/builtin/ does not work with HTTPS even in the current
Testing the HTTP/HTTPS and FTP Delegate proxy
  07/29-22:08 . 4022  "Jean Aumont" <> [259]
___ Hi Yukata, Thanks again for your response. My goal is to create a configuration file for the Delegate ftp proxy server that can support 3 requirements: 1) Acess a specific FTP server without UID/PWD
  07/30-00:44 . 4023 (Yutaka Sato) [72]
___ Hi, As I wrote, DeleGate as a FTP proxy does not support AUTHORIZER which are not in MOUNT option. In short, in FTP proxy, the destiantion The enclosed patch is a very tentative implementation of it
  07/30-08:45 . 4024 (Yutaka Sato) [62]
___ Hi, Here is an another solution. Your AUHTORIZER parameters can be unified into a single one as this: AUTHORIZER="-list{u1:p1,u2:p2},-list{u1,u2}(-reject.badpass),-any(others)" In the first -list, u
customization builtin messages and icons.
  07/30-09:54 . 4025  "David Wang" <> [79]
___ Hi Yutaka, Our current verison is 9.1.1, what did you mean this version "could be heavy and slow in HTTPS/SSL gateway"? Can I have its details? And if we'd like to MOUNT /-/builtin with https, which
  07/30-15:39 . 4026 (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ See the home page of DeleGate, especially the release information as <URL:> The current stable version is, as announced in the home page, 9.7.7 but
Use the same outgoing IP address as the incoming IP address
  07/31-05:12 . 4027  Sorin Esanu <> [12]
___ Hello, I run delegate (http proxy)on a multihomed linux server. Although delegate listens to all ips, the outgoing ip is always the main ip of the computer. Is it possible for delegate to use as out
  07/31-05:53 . 4028 (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ Why you need to do so? As long as I underdstand, an application program like DeleGate can't select the route to the destination server. You can select the source address of an outgoing connection by
  07/31-06:23 . 4029  Sorin Esanu <> [36]
___ Those 3 ips have different routes to world wide internet. So the application program does not have to select anything in respect to routes to destination servers. This is done by the hardware that r
  07/31-07:50 . 4030 (Yutaka Sato) [65]
___ Wow, do you really have such number of interfaces on a machine? With the enclosed patch, you can use the following options to bind the source address of an outgoing connection to the address of inco
Testing the HTTP/HTTPS and FTP Delegate proxy
  07/31-22:01 . 4031 (Yutaka Sato) [26]
___ Hi, I uploaded 9.8.3-pre3 including the above extension and yet another extension which is recommended. It is "-fail.badpass" to be used as follows: AUTHORIZER="-list{u1:p1,u2:p2},-fail.badpass,-any
  07/31-22:24 . 4032  "Jean Aumont" <> [43]
___ Thanks a lot for this. I will be trying it shortly. Thanks again. Jean Aumont ---Original Message--- From: Yutaka Sato [] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:01 AM To: feedba
  07/31-22:47 . 4033 (Yutaka Sato) [17]
___ Sorry, it is 9.8.4-pre3. You can get it at Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Institute of Ad
Use the same outgoing IP address as the incoming IP address
  08/01-03:07 . 4034  Sorin Esanu <> [76]
___ Not on this one I run delegate. But I have one with more than 300 ips, on a single real interface... Seems like this patch is working. I will test more and give some feedback. Thanks!
  08/01-09:26 . 4035 (Yutaka Sato) [28]
___ Hi, Ah, you meant non-real interafces. I see. I uploaded 9.8.4-pre3 including the patch and a little fix to be applied with it. It is for stopping reusing keep-alive to the server between clients of
NNTP-Delegate will not cache in Linux
  08/03-05:04 . 4036  Jeff <> [119]
___ Hi, I have been struggling for a week now with NNTP-Delegate. Everything works great and as expected except for caching. It just does not seem to work. I have tested under Fedora and a new version o
  08/03-08:22 . 4037 (Yutaka Sato) [49]
___ Hi Jeff, Thank you for your information. I tested a caching NNTP proxy by DeleGate on Fedora and saw a cached article never reused. In my case I saw a error message in LOGFILE as "### malformed arti
  08/04-04:31 . 4038  Jeff <> [143]
___ Hi again, Thanks for your response. Makes sense. Though I have not picked up that same error message in my logs but perhaps I am just not seeing it in amongst everything else. I have modified the co
  08/04-06:26 . 4039 (Yutaka Sato) [65]
___ Hi, If you see "islocal = 1" after "newServer = nntp://server" in your LOGFILE, it is the reason why the cache is disabled. DeleGate suppresses caching of articles from a local newsserver (a server
filtering between http and raw sockets communication on single port
  08/04-08:13 . 4040  jan de vries <> [35]
___ Hello, I have be trying and searching for hours but still no succes. I want to be able to filter the incomming traffic on my server. All http traffic has to be forwarded to webserver on port A and a
customization builtin messages and icons.
  08/04-11:32 . 4041  "David Wang" <> [53]
___ Hi Yutaka, Did you mean we have to install at least 9.8.4-pre2 or above to have the MOUNT /-/builtin working with https? Kind Regards, David ---Original Message--- From: Yutaka Sato [mailto:feedback
NNTP-Delegate will not cache in Linux
  08/05-04:36 . 4042  Jeff <> [843]
___ Hi Yutaka, Ok I have tried what you said I should try. Testing using the "simple method" does indeed write the article to the cache on the drive. However, testing with a typical NNTP client seems to
customization builtin messages and icons.
  08/05-11:32 . 4043  "David Wang" <> [54]
___ Hi Yutaka, Also regarding to upgrading, does it only need to replace the older executable delegated file with new one, which is compiled from source code? Is there any other files need to be updated
NNTP-Delegate will not cache in Linux
  08/05-12:07 . 4044 (Yutaka Sato) [113]
___ Hi, What the "typical NNTP client" is? In your log output, I saw why DeleGate does not cache with the client. It is because your client issues "BODY" command instead of "ARTICLE". As long as I know,
  08/05-17:13 . 4045 (Yutaka Sato) [38]
___ Nothing is bad with a extensive post. You seem specifying DGROOT not in the command-line of DeleGate but in a parameter file. DGROOT (and OWNER) is one of parameters which cannot be specified in a p
SSL with Socks
  08/05-17:15 . 4046  Andre <> [240]
___ Hey. In the long run want to use a ssl connection to a delegate sock proxy. I'm currently testing the correct establishment of a connection to a delegate proxy with ssl support. The connection will
NNTP-Delegate will not cache in Linux
  08/05-17:47 . 4047  Jeff <> [135]
___ Hi Yutaka, Thanks for correcting me. That makes sense now that you mention it. Maybe I should read the documentation thoroughly another time :-) I have tested after making the patch you suggested fo
filtering between http and raw sockets communication on single port
  08/05-18:38 . 4048  jan de vries <> [8]
___ I forgot to mention that i tried the recent stable version 9.7.7 from the zip. I experimented some more but still no luck. Is it possible to prepend every message on the raw socket connection with a
NNTP-Delegate will not cache in Linux
  08/05-19:09 . 4049 (Yutaka Sato) [111]
___ Hi, The modifications will be included in the next release (9.8.4-pre4). I see. Note that users except commercial licensee have no right to make their own modification to DeleGate. (and you are not
unusual application for delegated
  08/06-03:08 . 4050  Joe in MPLS <> [34]
___ I have a proprietary credit card authorization application that runs on an old mini-mainframe type machine that has no network encryption capability. I'd like to encrypt transactions between the poi
  08/06-03:38 . 4051 (Yutaka Sato) [34]
___ Hi, It can be configured as follows (for port number 2001 to 2050): delegated STLS=fcl TIMEOUT=io:0 -P2001-2050 SERVER=tcprelay://host:- Due to the size of the buffer for internal representation of
  08/06-04:39 . 4052  Joe in MPLS <> [60]
___ Yutaka, Thanks for the reply. Do the "internal representations of ports" consume resources even if they ports aren't used? Unfortunately the server ports aren't assigned sequentially in contiguous r
  08/06-05:20 . 4053 (Yutaka Sato) [39]
___ Hi, The "internal representation" is merely textually expanded representation of ports with its socket descriptor. For example -P2000-2003 can be represented internally as "-P2000/100,2001/101,2002/
customization builtin messages and icons.
  08/06-13:51 . 4054 (Yutaka Sato) [24]
___ Hi, 9.8.4-pre3 released last week including the patch is recommended. None. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Indu
NNTP-Delegate will not cache in Linux
  08/07-18:50 . 4055  Jeff <> [317]
___ Hi Yutaka, I have been testing the last patch you sent, it seems to work acceptably but I have noticed an interesting side effect. First off, let me explain briefly how I am testing. My setup has an
  08/07-19:34 . 4056 (Yutaka Sato) [59]
___ Hi, I'm sure that the tentative patch was coded behave as you described :p It receives ARTICLE response from the server to a cache file, then BODY part is extracted and forwarded to the client. It'l
How to verify a server's certificate?
  08/09-02:53 . 4057  Monika Schilling <> [156]
___ Hello, I succeeded in setting up DeleGate 9.7.7 as a gateway beetween a pop3 client and a pop3s server by using this configuration: -v ADMIN=... STLS=fsv -P127.0.0.1:50110 SERVER=pop REMITTABLE=pop3
  08/09-19:18 . 4058 (Yutaka Sato) [42]
___ Hi, Why do you think that DeleGate did not verify it? Your log shows that the verification of the server's certificate is succeeded (ok=1) based on your CAfile at [/home/ms/delegate/lib/CA.pem], thu
  08/11-01:24 . 4059  Monika Schilling <> [87]
___ Hi Yutaka, Why do you think that DeleGate did not verify it? Your log shows that the verification of the server's certificate is succeeded (ok=1) based on your CAfile at [/home/ms/delegate/lib/
  08/11-11:45 . 4060 (Yutaka Sato) [40]
___ Hi Monika, I implemented sslway.c of DeleGate to be compatible with the behavior of "apps/s_client.c" of OpenSSL. So if you test it with "openssl s_client" rather than "openssl verify", you will see
  08/11-15:58 . 4061 (Yutaka Sato) [31]
___ Hallo, I searched documents about "SSL_CTX_set_default_verify_paths()" but it seems not so well documented. The function seems to use two environment variables (defined in OpenSSL/crypto/cryptlib.h
  08/11-18:17 . 4062  Monika Schilling <> [25]
___ Hi Yutaka, Yes, this works! So I have an immediate solution. What do you think about a new DeleGate option which allows to switch off this implicit action. This avoids the scattered configuration (D
  08/11-18:36 . 4063 (Yutaka Sato) [37]
___ Hi, I did it tentatively for the testing :) But note that the SSL (TLS) configuration of DeleGate is moving from sslway options like -CApath to files under the CERTDIR (like ca-sv.pem) after DeleGat
  08/12-04:38 . 4064  Monika Schilling <> [23]
___ Hi Yutaka, Thank you for the pointer. I checked DeleGate 9.8.3 with the new way of configuration via files under CERTDIR. Everything works as expected. There is no need for using the trick with the
  08/12-15:08 . 4065 (Yutaka Sato) [125]
___ Hi, Is it true? I can't understand it because the simple code of sslway.c does load the default certificates anyway if the loading of given certificate is succeeded, regardless whether or not it is
  08/14-04:06 . 4066  Inside User <> [30]
___ DeleGate sounds like the only opensource project that stands a chance of providing similar features regarding MITM proxying of HTTPS, similar to that available in commercial products such as BlueCoa
How to verify a server's certificate?
  08/14-19:04 . 4067  Monika Schilling <> [131]
___ Yutaka, Yes! I just now checked it again. Calling DeleGate DGROOT=/home/ms/.DeleGate/9.8.3/ DGCONF=/home/ms/bin/ /usr/local/bin/delegated-9.8.3 DGROOT=$DGROOT
  08/16-22:48 . 4068 (Yutaka Sato) [257]
___ Monika, Your log does not include the status of "/etc/ssl/certs" so I can't confirm it. For example, the failure could occur if /etc/ssl/certs is empty, or thawteCp.pem is lacking, or the default ce
  08/17-02:29 . 4069  Monika Schilling <> [25]
___ Yakuta, I take this serious. So I entered turn 3 and unified the batch files of my test cases. Nothing (DGROOT, version of DG, ...) is hard coded anymore. These variables are now taken from a single
SSL Buffer_Underflow
  08/19-01:01 . 4070  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Egners?= <> [8]
___ Hello. I get a BUFFER_UNDERFLOW as a SSLEngineResult while calling unwrap. This happens every time the connection is closed. I'm using Delegate as a HTTPS Proxy with STLS=-fcl. The BUFFER_UNDERFLOW
  08/19-01:27 . 4071 (Yutaka Sato) [19]
___ Hi, Could you show me a little more about your usage and environment? How can I reproduce it? Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Institut
  08/19-01:45 . 4072  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Egners?= <> [16]
___ Hi. In our research group we are working on anonymity network and use an onion routing scheme which could be compared to TOR, therefore we chain SSL proxies. The error occurs while doing throughput
  08/19-02:52 . 4073 (Yutaka Sato) [102]
___ Hi, I have no experience with Java but I saw the document saying: <URL:> It could be the result of s
  08/19-03:11 . 4074 (Yutaka Sato) [24]
___ Andre, This document also says: It might be inappropriate but very usual and reasonable implementation (for faster and lighter shutdown of connection in a heavy loaded network). And what is clearly
  08/19-03:47 . 4075  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Egners?= <> [6]
___ Hi Yutaka. Thanks for the informative input, it is much appreciated. Best regards, Andre
  08/19-03:53 . 4076 (Yutaka Sato) [29]
___ Andre, Maybe the enclosed patch is the simplest modification to let DeleGate do the shutdown SSL in the appropriate way :) Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <>
FileZilla TLS security patch does not work with FTPS and Delegate
  08/19-16:37 . 4077 [1025]
___ Hello, We are using DeleGate as a ftp to ftps proxy. The setting used to work *very well* (and therefore a big thank you for the author of DeleGate). The problem is with Explicit and Implicit SSL/TL
  08/19-17:34 . 4078 (Yutaka Sato) [59]
___ Hi, This seems the same problem I heard last night... If so, you might be able to solve it with the patch I postedn in: <URL:> And more detailed lo
Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En] FileZilla TLS security patch does not work with F TPS and Delegate
  08/19-19:37 . 4079 [195]
___ Hi Yutaka, The patch you provided in fact solves the problem. It works fine again. Thank you very much. Cheers, Markus (Yutaka Sato) wrote on 19.08.2008 10:34:37: an FileZilla
nntp proxy as non root
  08/19-22:27 . 4080  Andreas Moroder <> [46]
___ Hello, I would like to start delegate as nntp proxy as nobody. I followed the instructions on but maybe I made something wrong in /usr/local i hav
  08/20-13:48 . 4081 (Yutaka Sato) [68]
___ First of all, you need nothing to do for it because it is the default behaviour of DeleGate when it is invoked by the root user. For example, you can test it as this: # delegated -P119 SERVER=nntp D
nntp an virus filtering or attachment blocking
  08/20-20:05 . 4082  Andreas Moroder <> [10]
___ Hello, we have delegaterunning as nntp proxy. Is it possible to pass scan the nntp traffic that passes delegate with a virus scanner ? If not, is it possible to configure delegate the way that attac
  08/21-19:43 . 4083 (Yutaka Sato) [30]
___ Hi, You can use the FTOCL parameter to filter each article by your own filter program. For example, you can erase any part exept text/plain in a multipart message using DeleGate as a MIME filtering
VStr overflow in Xstrcpy and TIME_WAIT state
  08/22-05:25 . 4084  "Jean Aumont" <> [309]
___ Hi Yutaka Sato, First, thanks a lot for developping this proxy. It is great. I have 2 questions regarding the "Delegated" proxy: Question 1: Is this normal to see "VStr overflow in Xstrcpy" in the E
  08/22-06:35 . 4085 (Yutaka Sato) [40]
___ Hi, The name is "DeleGate" :) No, it's abnormal. It might be the result of a long string (longer than 256bytes) in your configuration parameters like CMAP, AUTHORIZER, or so which could not be copie
  08/22-06:57 . 4086  "Jean Aumont" <> [88]
___ Hi, Thanks for replying so fast. Regarding the Question 1: Is this normal to see "VStr overflow in Xstrcpy" in the ERRORLOG file ? In my configuration file there is nothing longer than about 100 cha
  08/22-13:38 . 4087 (Yutaka Sato) [66]
___ Hi, Even if your input parameter is short, it might be expanded internally by DeleGate, and the result is reported in the LOGFILE. For example, a password string for -list{user:pass} in AUTHORIZER i
  08/22-22:08 . 4088  "Jean Aumont" <> [93]
___ Hi Yutaka, Thanks a lot for the info. I will try the patch. Jean Aumont ---Original Message--- From: Yutaka Sato [] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 12:38 AM To: feedback@de
tls ciphers
  08/23-05:53 . 4089 (Yutaka Sato) [31]
___ Hi, You need to include the keyword in the Subject or the body of your message to be forwarded to the list. The keyword is the name of the software, "DeleGate" :) Also messages with too many exclama
SSL Buffer_Underflow
  08/23-14:15 . 4090 (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ I found this message rejected because of too short body. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <> ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and
SSL no shared cipher
  08/24-23:46 . 4091  Andre <> [41]
___ Hi. While trying to influence the chosen cipher used for SSL connections, it was pointed out to me to use "STLS="fcl, sslway -cipher <list as in I tried a couple of options with the openssl s_server
FileZilla TLS security patch does not work with FTPS and Delegate
  08/25-03:11 . 4092 (Yutaka Sato) [29]
___ Hi, I read the discussion in the FileZilla forum including standpoints like mine :) <URL:> I'm suspicious if the way of shutdown handl
SSL no shared cipher
  08/25-03:17 . 4093  Andre <> [18]
___ Hi again. I tested this with some other ciphers, also deliberately forcing a specific cipher. When testing with the openssl s_server command, Diffie-Hellman parameters are generated. According to [1
  08/25-14:36 . 4094 (Yutaka Sato) [78]
___ Hi, I noticed that I have not implemented Diffie-Hellman handling :-O The enclosed patch does it by loading DH parameters from a file "dhparam.pem" under the default certificate store of DeleGate (C
  08/25-18:51 . 4095  Andre <> [88]
___ Hi. Thanks again for the quick response. The supplied patch works like a charm. Best regards, Andre Yutaka Sato schrieb:
Delegate-CLOSE_WAIT problem
  08/29-00:20 . 4096  "Jean Aumont" <> [277]
___ Hi Yukata, I have a serious problem using the delegate HTTP proxy. After using it for a while, its stops accepting connections. To temporaly fix the problem, I added MAXIMA=listen:500 to my config.
  09/01-18:50 . 4097 (Yutaka Sato) [44]
___ Hi, If this happens on usual situation, caused by DeleGate, it must have been fixed. So I think there are something unusual in your case, but I don't know anything about it. Informations as follows
FW: [DeleGate-En] Windows Integrated Authentication
  09/02-21:15 . 4098  "Nagel, Willy" <> [602]
___ Hi Yutaka, This doesn't seem to resolve the issue. Maybe you have another clue? Here's what appears in the logfile (beneath this logfile are results when not using the HTTPCONF add-rhead value): 06/
  09/03-03:17 . 4099 (Yutaka Sato) [23]
___ Hi, It seems that I implemented "NTLM over HTTP" in DeleGate/9.8.2 as CHANGES file records: Thus recent DeleGate should work with it with "-Enh" option. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delega
SSL no shared cipher
  09/04-08:19 . 4100  =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9_Egners?= <> [17]
___ Hi. I tested the new Diffie-Hellman functionality a little more thoroughly and it turns out that there is a problem. If I start up the server as a https proxy with the necessary dhparam in place (th
Empty-Articles = [4002]
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:04/05 18:06:31 (4 sec) Expires:04/06 00:06:27 @_@V