Article delegate-en/3624 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
[Reference:<_A3622@delegate-en.ML_>]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: Trying to get selectable-SOCKS working (application level routing)
29 Jan 2007 14:58:41 GMT Timothy Brown <pdyhabdyi-t75q7lq64njr.ml@ml.delegate.org>


Yutaka,

delegated -v -P28222 RESOLV=sys SERVER=socks CONNECT=s,d  
SOCKS="localhost:9050:\!*.blahblah.com"

Am I correct that this line above is supposed to prevent delegate  
from forwarding traffic for .blahblah.com to the SOCKS proxy, but  
permit everything else to go over to the proxy?

Thanks,
Tim


On Jan 28, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Yutaka Sato wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message <_A3621@delegate-en.ML_> on  
> 01/28/07(23:02:23)
> you Timothy Brown <pdyhabdyi-t75q7lq64njr.ml@ml.delegate.org> wrote:
>  |This is what I get when attempting to browse a web page using the
>  |mechanisms described:
>  |
>  |(Mac OS X points to delegate, delegate points to SOCKS exposed  
> via SSH)
> ...
>  |My command line:
>  |
>  |delegated -v -P28222 SERVER=socks SOCKS="localhost:9250:*.cnn.com"
>  |
>  |Full debug:
> ...
>  |01/28 08:58:10.92 [16106] 1+1: [SocksV5-serv] VER[5] NMETHODS[1]  
> [0][0]
>  |01/28 08:58:10.92 [16106] 1+1: [SocksV5-serv] VER[5] CMD[1] ATYP[3]
>  |www.cnn.com:80
>  |01/28 08:58:10.92 [16106] 1+1: SocksV5_udpassoc: UDP ASSOC error 
> (V5 0)
>  |01/28 08:58:12.92 [16106] 1+1: {R} [www.cnn.com]*1 q=1,a=0,  
> s=1,r=0 (2s)
>  |01/28 08:58:12.97 [16106] 1+1: SocksV5_udpassoc: UDP ASSOC error 
> (V5 0)
>  |01/28 08:58:20.97 [16106] 1+1: {R} [www.cnn.com]*2 q=1,a=0, s=1,r=0
> ...
>  |This is on Mac OS X.
>  |Resolver issues?
>
> Hmm...
>
> 1) DNS query for www.cnn.com is also forwarded to the upstream  
> SOCKS server
>    at localhost:9250.  This seems a bug in the implementation of  
> DeleGate.
>
> 2) by somewhat unknown reason, the upstream SOCKS server does not  
> support,
>    accept, or surve the DNS relay over SOCKS (I'm curious about the  
> reason)
>
> For a while, the problem might be able to be bypassed by a parameter
> as follows:
>
>   RESOLV=sys
>
> Cheers,
> Yutaka
> --
>   9 9   Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/
>  ( ~ )  National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and  
> Technology
> _<   >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
> Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller


  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
@_@V