Articles delegate-en/3570-3600 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 3570 - 3600   digest:
Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3573] Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3569] relative paths
  11/03-17:16 . 3570 (Yutaka Sato) [45]
___ Hi, OK, I understand that you are using DeleGate as a gateway between HTTP cleints and a HTTPS server, reached via another HTTP proxy. Any URL of "https://..." in responses from the server must be r
DeleGate/9.3.0 (STABLE) -- new stable version
  11/07-22:10 . 3571 (Yutaka Sato) [43]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.3.0 -- new stable version This is a new stable version of DeleGate with new features and many fixes
Question on switching upstream proxy based on port
  11/11-06:44 . 3572  "Tetsu Saiga" <> [40]
___ Hi, I'm trying to have Delegrate run as a Application level router that will switch to either a HTTP proxy or SOCKS base on the port. If it's port 80 then it should use a HTTP proxy and SOCKS for ev
  11/11-08:22 . 3573 (Yutaka Sato) [47]
___ Hi, As far as I remember, I've never announced that DeleGate supports relaying as a circuit level proxy as SOCKS and forwarding to an application level proxy as a HTTP proxy, although I've been inte
  11/11-13:15 . 3574  "Tetsu Saiga" <> [60]
___ Thanks for the help! It works great. I did notice the protocol being the same when I tested without the "http://" in PROXY. Seems like you made PROXY flexible because I was able to do "PROXY=proto:/
Odd HTTP proxy caching retrieval behaviour
  11/11-14:13 . 3575  "Tetsu Saiga" <> [154]
___ Hi, HTTP proxy caching is a bit odd. This is with version 9.3.0. The HTTP proxy runs with "delegated -P8080 SERVER=http CACHE=do". Files are cached but they do not get used after the same file is re
  11/12-04:31 . 3576 (Yutaka Sato) [43]
___ This "(no-cache)" in the log means the request from the client indicated not to use the cache, maybe with "Pragma: no-cache" or "Cache-Control: max-age=0" or so which is issued with a "Reload button
  11/12-09:47 . 3577  "Tetsu Saiga" <> [79]
___ You're right there's a "Cache-Control: no-cache". 1 GET xxxxxxxxxx HTTP/1.1 2 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded 3 Keep-Alive: 300 4 User-Agent: xxxxx 5 Host: 6 Cache-Co
DeleGate/9.3.1 (STABLE) -- a fix for SSL session cache with client's certificate
  11/14-19:12 . 3578 (Yutaka Sato) [29]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.3.1 -- a fix for SSL session cache with client's certificate Fixed the server-side SSL session cache
about sockmux pipe
  11/15-14:22 . 3579  "feng yan" <> [69]
___ hello, I installed DG9.3.0 in Linux. run delegate ,follow: SERVER=sockmux:commout@/tmp/wfifo PORT=9023 SERVER=sockmux:commout@/tmp/rfifo SERVER=http,-in delegated did not work .I found s
  11/15-14:48 . 3580 (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, It seems that I did break SockMux over FIFO, maybe in DeleGate9.2. You can escape the problem with a parameter as follows: SOXCONF=crypt:no I'll fix the problem in DeleGate9.4.0. Cheers, Yutaka
  11/15-15:22 . 3581  "feng yan" <> [65]
___ hi,cheers now,delegate is ok! thanks for your help 2006/11/15, Yutaka Sato <>:
need for a ssh/scp proxy
  11/18-17:47 . 3582  "Ulrich Sommer" <> [55]
___ Hi, I'm using delegate for proxying telnet and ftp. Also I have hacked a little shell programm for proxying the ssh but outside from delegate. I think, that proxying ssh in the way like telnet and f
Linux HTTPS reverse proxy
  11/26-16:50 . 3583  Daniel Aizenstein <> [14]
___ Hi, I want to install delegate on a Linux SUSE system. I want to achieve the folowing: a user connect using HTTP protocol, the proxy work as expected. When a user connect using HTTPS protocol, the s
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  12/01-00:02 . 3584  Steve Brown <> [112]
___ Hi Yutaka, Please find the following two logs that hopefully will start to explain what I'm troubled with. I'm pretty sure the problem _only_ occurs when Delegate negotiates a TLS FTP session with t
Opera socks!!
  12/01-19:39 . 3585  "Mat Moot" <> [50]
___ Dear all, As you may know Opera does not support socks proxies, so the only way for me to do that was either through using sockscap or something similar (which causes some problems to my system) or
  12/02-17:01 . 3586 (Yutaka Sato) [25]
___ I'm not sure what "Opera" is but if it is a HTTP client and what you need is to relay from a HTTP-proxy (DeleGate running on the port #8080 for example) to a SOCKS server (running on the SocksHost:1
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  12/02-17:47 . 3587 (Yutaka Sato) [38]
___ Hi, The problem seems not in SSL but in TCP/IP level. DeleGate says that it simply failed to establish TCP connection to the port on the server which was shown in the response for a PASV command. Yo
Linux HTTPS reverse proxy
  12/02-17:55 . 3588 (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ I don't have experience with LDAP authenticaiton, but if you have PAM LDAP module installed, it should be able with a command like this: delegated -P8080 SERVER=http AUTHORIZER=-pam/ldap:https Cheer
Opera socks!!
  12/02-20:19 . 3589  "Mat Moot" <> [79]
___ Thanx, I appreciate your reply...this did work.. Opera is basically a browser which i am using sometimes instead of IE or FF. The funny thing is that they included a bittorrent client built-in in th
  12/02-20:59 . 3590 (Yutaka Sato) [33]
___ Hi, If you are not allowed to use proxy, you must not use it. By the way, it is technically easy to get rid of arbitrary HTTP headers with a parameter as this: HTTPCONF=kill-qhead:Via Cheers, Yutaka
  12/03-10:14 . 3591  "Mat Moot" <> [74]
___ Thanx for the help...this did the saved the day :) :) I use a proxy to bypass another proxy!! kind regards,
DeleGate/9.4.0 (ALPHA) -- implanted configuration parameters in the executable file
  12/04-23:46 . 3592 (Yutaka Sato) [181]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.4.0 -- (ALPHA) -- implanted configuration parameters in the executable file IMPLANTED CONFIGURATION
delegate FCL core dump
  12/05-02:08 . 3593 [31]
___ hello yutaka on my fedora core 6 i get core dumps when fcl is used e.g https / sockmux / STLS or the like what information can i provide to help solve this issue ? greetz from germany fly out to jap
  12/05-12:04 . 3594 (Yutaka Sato) [20]
___ Hi Martin, If you have received a mail from DeleGate automatically generated on the core dump including log and the backtrace, it will be so useful. Otherwise, the log of DeleGate around the core du
  12/05-23:06 . 3595 [186]
___ hello yutaka, here'z the bug report: PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO <>. IT WILL BE HELPFUL FOR DEBUGGING. Subject: DeleGate-Report: SIGQUIT From: [99] To: dele
  12/06-10:53 . 3596 (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ Hi, Unfortunatelly the auto. bug-report of DeleGate did not contain enough information about how it is caused, so I need more info. - Can you see me the LOGFILE of DeleGate in the test ? - Did the p
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS) (SOLVED)
  12/06-22:23 . 3597  Steve Brown <> [36]
___ Hi Guys, You are absolutely correct. You prompted me to do some in depth debugging and I'm sending this in case it helps anyone else out in a firewalled environment. Our FTP proxy uses IPtables as a
multi-protocol Transparent Proxy over SOCKS (Re: Question on switching upstream proxy based on port)
  12/08-14:17 . 3598 (Yutaka Sato) [60]
___ Hi, I prototyped it in DeleGate version 9.4.1-pre2. With it, you don't need multiple-DeleGates for SOCKS and HTTP cache connected with TCP but only a single DeleGate for a SOCKS will act as a HTTP c
delegate e-a core dump
  12/09-08:08 . 3599  Martin Papadopoulos <> [99]
___ hello yutak, finally made a log excerption for your investigation on the e-a dump 12/09 00:04:53.21 [7997] 0+0: ## accept([8]:8080)=16 12/09 00:04:53.21 [8001] 1+0: -- Fork(SequentialServer): 7997 -
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS) (SOLVED)
  12/11-01:01 . 3600 (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ Hi Steve, Thank you for your precise description of the problem. It'll be helpful for others who will encounter the same problem, and for me to reduce a suspicion on DeleGate :) Maybe what DeleGate
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:03/30 05:36:13 (2 sec) Expires:03/30 11:36:11 @_@V