Articles delegate-en/3540-3570 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 3540 - 3570   digest:
HTTP to HTTPS conversion problem
  10/09-13:55 . 3540  "Lito Kusnadi" <pzugqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [155]
___ Hi, I managed to compile the delegate sourcecode in Linux Centos 4.3. I used a config file to run delegate as follow: -P8000 SERVER=http -v MOUNT="/* https://online.toll.com.au/*" STLS=fsv:https HOS
  10/09-16:18 . 3541  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [45]
___ Hi, The reason of the failure is the failure of dynamic loading of SSL libraries. You seems not have the SSL libraries on an appropriate directory (typically /usr/lib or /lib). This shows that your
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  10/09-22:01 . 3542  Steve Brown <ps4gabdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [129]
___ Hi Yutaka, I'm experiencing odd things when I use Delegate to act as a TLS FTP gateway like you kindly described. Essentially, a non-TLS capable client when connecting via Delegate to a TLS capable
  10/10-00:12 . 3543  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [136]
___ Hi, What is this "controlport-2" and "controlport-2" ? Seeing what the difference is between the case of the failure and the success will be helpful. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.
HTTP to HTTPS conversion problem
  10/10-08:57 . 3544  "Lito Kusnadi" <pzugqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [69]
___ Thanks Yutaka, I'll try to compile again. By the way, would delegate be possible to remember the initial connectivity? This is the illustration: traffic converted from HTTP to HTTPS) When RemoteServ
  10/10-09:05 . 3545  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ You have /usr/lib/libssl.so ? If so and you compiled DeleGate without modification (without options like -static), any recompilation will not be useful to solve the problem. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutak
delegate security flaw [Virus checked]
  10/18-18:38 . 3546  p3igqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [49]
___ hello yutaka, i recently discovered a security flaw which is related to the delegate permission control allthough using a filter like FCL="sslway ... -Vrfy" , when running in master mode , clients w
  10/18-20:46 . 3547  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [47]
___ Hi, Maybe you are using a version of DeleGate older than DeleGate/9.2.5-pre7. As written in <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/tls/> after DeleGate/9.0 I'm shifting to STLS=fcl,fsv instead obsole
  10/18-21:05 . 3548  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, I found that FCL,FSV=sslway with MASTER is not disabled in the latest vesion. It'll be disabled in 9.2.5. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) N
Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3553] delegate security flaw [Virus checked]
  10/18-21:26 . 3549  p3igqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [204]
___ Hello Yutaka, even with stls this is not the case ! the permission is denied after an initial relay has been made to an arbitrary server. therefore the delegate master process still is vulnerable to
  10/18-21:46 . 3550  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [19]
___ Hi, If SSL is failed with STLS=fcl, MASTER DeleGate (with SERVER=delegate) cannot know any of client's request including the desitination server, so it cannot connect to anywhere. I think so. Cheers
Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3556] Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3553] delegate security flaw [Virus checked]
  10/18-22:02 . 3551  p3igqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [132]
___ Hi , but in fact it is !. can i provide you with some logs to investigate this, or you can setup a simple scenario on your own an see it actually happen . no offense, but for the time beeing i have
  10/18-22:10 . 3552  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [21]
___ Hi, Hmm... it is very starange. Are you using dynamically linked version of SSL libraries (which has become the standard of DeleGate/9) instead of the obsoleted sslway as the external command ? Anyw
delegate myauth encrypted user:pass
  10/19-22:00 . 3553  ppefabdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [28]
___ hello yutaka , is it possible to have myauth=user:pass in the same manner as -Fauth dgauth ( aka encrypted data in a file ) because on a command line invokement the myauth is shown in clear text . g
  10/20-00:08 . 3554  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [32]
___ Hi, You can encrypt your configuration parameters including MYAUTH stored in a parameter file, like +="config.cdh", as described in <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/Manual.htm?EncryptedConf> I
DeleGate/9.2.5 (BETA) -- signed executable, fixes for chained DeleGate, SSL, etc.
  10/20-07:30 . 3555  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [147]
___ Dear DeleGate users, I inform you of the new release of DeleGate available as follows: DeleGate/9.2.5 -- signed executable, fixes for chained DeleGate, SSL, etc. + Verification of signed executable
delegate security flaw [Virus checked]
  10/20-10:05 . 3556  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [38]
___ Hi, I still cannot figure out the case in which SERVER=delegate with STLS=fcl does accept and connect to the target server even when SSL with the client is failed, so your example and/or log showing
Antwort: Re: delegate security flaw [Virus checked]
  10/20-20:47 . 3557  p3igqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [191]
___ hello yutaka, the new version works like a charm. encrpytion and authentication works as expected. i cannot provide the logs anymore, because they are deleted automatically. anyways , i'll keep an e
Filter and scan https traffic
  10/23-21:09 . 3558  Andreas Moroder <p4ygqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [21]
___ Hello, I am new to DeleGate. Today we have the following configuration: same server) -> firewall -> world. Now I would like to filter https traffic and more important, to scan for viruses the https
  10/24-04:29 . 3559  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [32]
___ Hi, I think it should be possible with the feather of DeleGate named MITM + CFI. <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/mitm/> The configuration of DeleGate for it will be like this: delegated -P8080
Using delegate to gateway imap to pop.gmail.com
  10/30-11:38 . 3560  Doug Scoular <p5agqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [47]
___ Hi All, I've been trying to use delegated to allow me to access pop.gmail.com. I want to proxy localhost port 993 using IMAP via SSL to Google mail port 995 using POP via SSL. I've tried the followi
  10/31-11:00 . 3561  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [19]
___ Hi, As far as I know, DeleGate does not support the gateway from IMAP to POP. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced In
relative paths
  10/31-22:22 . 3562  p5igqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [214]
___ Hi, I am using Delegate 9_2_5 proxy with a website that makes use of relative paths, however these paths appear incorrectly under certain cirmustances. I think I might need to configure the HTMLCONV
  11/01-05:07 . 3563  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [50]
___ Hi, DeleGate does "normalization" of URLs in response data before applying a URL translation for MOUNT. The normalization is applied to get rid of illegal references to URL which should not be seen
Delegate behaviour analogue among well-known POP3 servers
  11/02-16:32 . 3564  Soldatov Andrey <p5qgqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [7]
___ Hello, do you know big well-known POP3 server with SSL support on non-dedicated port which returns on CAPA command (at the beginning of connection) the same as DeleGate: C:\DeleGate> dg9_2_3 -f STLS
Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3569] relative paths
  11/03-00:11 . 3565  p5igqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [231]
___ Hi, still having problems with this parameter. What I maybe forgot to mention is that I use Delegate as an certificate host and for ssltunneling. If I use the parameters as advised, I need to verify
  11/03-05:19 . 3566  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [28]
___ Hi, Sorry but I cant see what does "certificate host" mean. If you need to relay HTTPS/SSL as a HTTP proxy relaying the server's certificate as is to the client, without STLS=mitm, there is nothing
supported CAPA / STLS for POP3 (Re: Delegate behaviour analogue among well-known POP3 servers)
  11/03-10:50 . 3567  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [155]
___ Hi, I don't know so mutch about POP3 implementations because I'm not a practical user of POP3. I think the response from DeleGate can be so if you specified STLS="fcl" but it could not be with STLS=
=?koi8-r?Q?Re=3A_supported_CAPA_/_STLS_for_POP3_(Re=3A_Delegate_behaviour_analogue_among_well-known_POP3_servers)?=
  11/03-13:09 . 3568  Soldatov Andrey <p5qgqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [12]
___ Hello, Yutaka, on 3 Nov 2006 you wrote Of course, I misprinted in my example. I used STLS=fcl but not STLS=-fcl. Thank you very much for your answer and for your code. Everything is clear now. Best
Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3573] Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3569] relative paths
  11/03-16:00 . 3569  p5igqbdyi-jqwqhpejm6xr.ml@ml.delegate.org [241]
___ Hi, ok here's the content of the configuration file. Operating system is Windows. ADMIN=a@a.. SERVER=http TIMEOUT=dns:120,acc:300,con:300,silence:0 DELAY=reject:2 MOUNT=/* https://myaddress.adress.n
  11/03-17:16 . 3570  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [45]
___ Hi, OK, I understand that you are using DeleGate as a gateway between HTTP cleints and a HTTPS server, reached via another HTTP proxy. Any URL of "https://..." in responses from the server must be r
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:03/30 07:00:29 (1 sec) Expires:03/30 13:00:28 @_@V