Articles delegate-en/3431-3477 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 3431 - 3477   digest:
ftps fails to work with client side ssl utilized.... connected but directory hangs
  08/01-06:38 . 3431  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [37]
  Hi, I think the LOGFILE of your DeleGate shows some hints about the problem. If the server is accessible by me, I'll test it. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org
delegate socks with authorizer and ssl
  08/01-13:26 . 3432  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [38]
  hello yutaka, so far , i managed to have a socks delegate server with authorization, as described in the manual with -Fauth. on the client side i use a delegate proccess with MYAUTH=someuser:somepw:
STLS=fsv for SOCKS (Re: delegate socks with authorizer and ssl)
  08/02-02:16 . 3433  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [70]
  Hi Papa, As long as I know, SSL between SOCKS-DeleGate has not been implemented yet because there has no such request, and I have a little hesitation over the specification. SSL can be applied to th
SSL between SOCKS-DeleGate (Re: STLS=fsv for SOCKS)
  08/02-02:52 . 3434  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [53]
  Hi, I noticed that FTP/PORT command freezes with this SOCKS/SSL because STLS=fsv is not applied to the BIND command of SOCKS. It'll be fixed as the enclosed patch in the next pre-release. Cheers, Yu
ftps fails to work with client side ssl utilized.... connected but directory hangs
  08/02-03:50 . 3435  Michael Ingardia <pmugqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [164]
  The ftp server that I am trying to hit is www.end2endlogic.com which is a linux fedora 3 server running vsftpd. It is publically accessible. I am using filezilla as a client to connect to this as a
  08/02-04:27 . 3436  Michael Ingardia <pmugqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [109]
  Ok I tried this remotely, and in order to hit my ftp server you have to have an active connection. PASV fails due to fire wall rules most likely. Here is the log: 08/01 14:14:55.38 [2856] 1+0/9/6: f
  08/02-04:40 . 3437  Michael Ingardia <pmugqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [52]
  One last note: You can also reproduce the problem against this ftp server which you can download and run locally. http://javasecureftpd.sourceforge.net/ Mike...
  08/02-04:54 . 3438  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [38]
  Hi, I think this is the problem. Maybe inheriting the socket handle (connected to the client or server) from DeleGate to the SSL wrapper process (SSLway) fails by some reason, then DeleGate detects
  08/02-08:02 . 3439  Michael Ingardia <pmugqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [64]
  So ... Set up a linux box installed delegate 9.2.3 ... ran it on port 1080 ...with same paramaters as windows ie SERVER=ftp STLS=fcl,fsv Got the same issue... client connects to delegate just fine .
SSL between SOCKS-DeleGate (Re: STLS=fsv for SOCKS)
  08/03-02:13 . 3440  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [107]
  Hello Yutaka, the background of my posting maybe of interest to you. i was looking for a way to do user+password authentication on a generalist, sockmux or socks delegate. for now i used as best pra
  08/03-10:55 . 3441  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [39]
  Hi, You can use SSL-certificate for MASTER ans SockMux too if you connect between DeleGate with SSLway. You can use AUTHORIZER and MYAUTH for the chaining of DeleGate by MASTER as this for example:
Question about TCP
  08/03-20:01 . 3442  George Tyshchenko <poigqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [18]
  Hello, Thanks fro developing DeleGate, I just have one question. How can I intercept TCP requests from my machine from certain port? For example a program accesses google.com:80 but delegate forward
password auth. of SockMux (Re: SSL between SOCKS-DeleGate)
  08/04-02:45 . 3443  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
  Hi, I uploaded 9.2.4-pre11 which introduced password authentication for SockMux. Now you can use AUTHORIZER + MYAUTH with SERVER=sockmux as this: % delegated -P8000 SERVER=sockmux AUTHORIZER="-list{
10 times faster SockMux (Re: DeleGate - sockmux network performance)
  08/04-03:27 . 3444  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [38]
  Hi, In DeleGate/9.2.4-pre11, I expanded the size of the SockMux packet from 512 bytes to 16K bytes. It improved the performance (throughput) of SockMux about ten times, from 150Kbytes/sec to 1.5Mbyt
password auth. of SockMux (Re: SSL between SOCKS-DeleGate)
  08/06-01:12 . 3445  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [82]
  hello yutaka , works like a charm, also the sockmux is doing really fine :-) domo arigato, Mr. Sato ! Yutaka Sato schrieb:
delegate credhy
  08/06-04:28 . 3446  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [32]
  hello yutaka, the informations on credhy provided by the manual are somewhat slim.. i am particular intersted in the key parameters, eg. how can i use common key params between two delegate processe
  08/06-04:56 . 3447  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
  Hi, Sorry but what is the "common key"? If you mean the key for encryption, it is generated automatically with "Deffie-Hellman keY agreement" algorithm, thus it is not necessary to be given manually
delegate rejects domains not in the list
  08/06-20:07 . 3448  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [41]
  hello yuataka, i am using delegate as an smtp-gateway with a long reject list ( aprox 147 items currently ). i have each domain in a sepearate REJECT= statement. allthoug not defined some domains ar
  08/07-00:54 . 3449  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
  Hi, Hmm. For example? I don't think so. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology _< >_
  08/07-01:46 . 3450  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [67]
  hello yutaka, for example mails from mxpool*.ebay.com i could send you a prepared log file for analysis if you want to. greetz martin papadopoulos Yutaka Sato schrieb:
  08/07-02:34 . 3452  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
  Hi, Your mail including the whole REJECT list was posted to the open forum forwarded via feedback@delegate.org, so I removed it from the spool. Well, your REJECT list includes a line as this: REJECT
  08/07-03:35 . 3453  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [63]
  hello yutaka, works fine now , keep up the good work ! greetz martin papadopoulos Yutaka Sato schrieb:
Is there any way to control&limit user's Session&Connections when use delegate as socks 5 proxy?
  08/07-05:33 . 3454  liword <ppygqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [3]
  Is there any way to control&limit user's Session&Connections when use delegate as socks 5 proxy?For example limit useA can create only 1 session to connect net at a time.
  08/07-08:01 . 3455  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [28]
  There is no SOCKS specific control but a generic parameter to limit the max. number of connection from a host at a time as this: MAXIMA=conpch:1 This limitation can be applied only to a specified ho
  08/07-11:01 . 3456  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [115]
  Hi, Limiting resource usage per user is a feature in the TODO list of DeleGate to be supported from the beginning. Now I feel it might be a time, so I tried to implement it (it will be released in 9
SPAM blocking by DeleGate (Re: delegate rejects domains not in the list)
  08/07-13:36 . 3457  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [143]
  Hi, By the way, if your intention is to block SPAMs, I don't recommend you to use the REJECT list based on domain name, since it is difficult to identify exaustless spammers by domain spreading over
  08/08-01:31 . 3458  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [571]
  hello yutaka, it would be awesome if you could implement an smtp reject for non mx servers. i mean that if the reverse lookup entry does not contain a valid MX record, or to satisfy scenario of mult
  08/08-12:01 . 3459  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [43]
  Hi, Doing access control based on the (existence of) MX record seems useful and I'll support it in the next release. But "callback" will be useful to be used together with it. Yes, spammers do not t
  08/08-12:26 . 3460  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [52]
  Hi, I tested an extenstion like the enclosed patch with a parameter as follows: RELIABLE="_MX.*" It seems working as I expected to reject hosts without a MX record. It will be able to be extended to
  08/10-01:13 . 3461  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [55]
  Hi, I uploaded 9.2.4-pre14 including SMTP extension as follows which may be useful in your case: <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/Manual.htm?SMTPCONF> Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@del
  08/10-03:18 . 3462  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [222]
  hello yutaka, its excelent ! best practice to me seems SMTPCONF=reject:nohelo+notmxhelo. greetz from germany ... :-) martin papadopoulos Yutaka Sato schrieb:
  08/11-03:35 . 3463  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [230]
  hello yutaka, unfortunately there is some real bad news ! even companies like *b*y do not follow smtp protocol with ehlo , ehlo-mx and so forth. i don't recommend this setup , not even to your site,
  08/11-05:00 . 3464  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [30]
  Hi, I'm not so surprised about it because I've seen so many broken HELO on SMTP for twenty years. But at least SMTPCONF=reject:nohelo is known practical because it is the default of DeleGate for six
MLSD vs. LIST when proxying
  08/16-23:26 . 3465  Steffen Kaiser <p44eqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [83]
  Hello, I have a Delegate FTP proxy forwarding requests to a Delegate master. Both DeleGate/9.2.3-pre12 . I connect to the proxy anonymously, then issue: cd //server dir using ncftp I get this result
delegate rewrite
  08/17-02:39 . 3466  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [29]
  hello yutaka, is it possible with delegate as an http proxy , to rewrite the user-agent header ? greetz martin papadopoulos
MLSD vs. LIST when proxying
  08/17-19:32 . 3467  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [45]
  DeleGate announces that MLST/MLSD is availabe by default replying to the FEAT command from clients. It can be disabled with: FTPCONF=nomlsx Maybe it should be so by default when DeleGate is not acti
delegate rewrite
  08/17-20:41 . 3468  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [19]
  Hi, Unconditional replacement of User-Agent to "xxx" is done as follows: HTTPCONF="kill-qhead:User-Agent" HTTPCONF="add-qhead:User-Agent:xxx" Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> htt
MLSD vs. LIST when proxying
  08/18-19:11 . 3469  Steffen Kaiser <p44eqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [30]
  Hello, Works like charme! I also grasp from the suggestion that there is no easy way to tranform LIST <-> MLSD on the fly. Bye, Steffen Kaiser
delegate multiple proxy
  08/23-03:54 . 3470  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [30]
  hello yutaka, is it possible to have multiple proxies e.g. for different domains routed ? delegate -P8080 SERVER=http PROXY=dom1:8080:domain1 PROXY=dom2:8080 ... ? greetz
  08/23-10:28 . 3471  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [16]
  Hi, Yes. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology _< >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki
ftp/sftp service not available
  08/25-17:30 . 3472  "Gsandtner Michael" <psagqbdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [340]
  I have problems running the ftp/sftp gateway. ftp client says: "421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection". Detailed log of delegate below. The connection with command line sftp
Pop3proxy -- Timeout with malformed MimeMessages
  08/30-21:04 . 3473  Gateman <pz4dabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [92]
  Hi yutaka, we use delegate(V9.1.1)as a pop3proxy and have problems with some malformed mime messages. Delegate strips of some part of the message so that the client doesn't see the end of the messag
delegate article 3443
  08/30-22:13 . 3474  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-ok6onjpk236r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [30]
  hello yutaka, at least for the scenario authorizing delegate master process , the authorization does not function for the sockmux scenario it does work however . greetinx martin papadopoulos
Pop3proxy -- Timeout with malformed MimeMessages
  08/31-00:37 . 3475  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [126]
  Hi, Your dump shows it's not 0x20 but 0x00 which is a string terminator of C, and not 0E0D0A but 2E0D0A which is a message terminator of POP (and SMTP, NNTP). The problem is caused because DeleGate
  08/31-01:23 . 3476  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [129]
  Hi, Sorry, I found that the patch is not enough for POP, and encoding a character into multi-bytes might cause another problem on the buffer boundary. So just ignoring '\0' might be the practical wo
  08/31-12:31 . 3477  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [191]
  Hi, I released 9.2.4-pre20 with the workaround. It simply ignores '\0' in a messege by default. You can test to relay '\0' as is with an option MIMECONV="zero:utf8" Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y
Empty-Articles = [3451]
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:01/19 12:04:48 (2 sec) Expires:01/19 18:04:46 @_@V