Article delegate-en/228 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Newsgroups: mail-lists.delegate-en

[DeleGate-En] Re: Delegate as BW manager
16 Jan 1999 09:09:16 GMT (Yutaka Sato)

On 01/16/99(17:42) I wrote in <_A227@delegate-en.ML_>
 |On 01/15/99(00:56) you Evaghelos Tsiotsios <> wrote
 |in <_A219@delegate-en.ML_>
 | |> I ran across Delegate in Freshmeat and I would like to ask whether you
 | |> have implemented in the program any bandwidth management features (you
 | |> know, like the amount of bandwidth allocated to various protocols or per
 | |> user limitations) or if you are planning to do that in a future version of
 | |> the program. 
 | |> This would be very interesting for bandwidth-tuning the WAN link for the
 | |> various protocols passing through.
 |I'm reminded of a similar question made last September in this
 |"mailing-list" and my answer is at

I'm reminded of another fact that I made an experimental feature
about process scheduling and flow control by DeleGate in last October.
The original intention of the feature was preventing CPU and bandwidth
from occupied unfairly by a few intensive clients, and it was
implemented based on nice() and sleep().  I suppose that generalizing
these mechanism and controlling it by parameters like sorts of protocols
and users, as in access control, will do somewhat like bandwidth
management with a little extension to the existing mechanism of DeleGate.

Yutaka Sato <>   @ @ 
Computer Science Division, Electrotechnical Laboratory      ( - )
1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan            _<   >_

  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]